Uncategorized

The Eagles are not getting Marcus Mariota: A Look at the Eagles QB Situation, Part 1

Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission – at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.

The quarterback position is going to hang around the Eagles offseason like an anvil. Most people believe that the Eagles lack a true franchise caliber quarterback. These same individuals are concerned that the Eagles are in the proverbial no man’s land – too good to land a top quarterback prospect, but too bad to challenge for a Super Bowl with their current options.

In this three part series I analyze whether the Eagles quarterback situation is as dire as it seems. Part 1 focuses on whether the Eagles can realistically get Marcus Mariota. Part 2 looks at Mark Sanchez and quarterbacks outside of the Eagles organization. Part 3 will focus on Nick Foles. Let’s get right to it.

Marcus Mariota

Marcus Mariota is the latest jewel in the eyes of Eagles fans. He’s mobile, athletic, put up gaudy numbers in college, and oh yea, did you know he played under Chip Kelly? Adding fuel to the speculation, Chip Kelly recently declared that he has an even bigger man-crush on Mariota than the rest of Philadelphia, saying Mariota was “the most talented kid that I coached in college.”

And now that Kelly has full control over player personnel, there is a growing segment of Eagles fans who think trading up to get Mariota is a realistic possibility.

And then it happened: speaking to 97.5 the Fanatic, Trent Dilfer darn near broke the internet in Philadelphia when he said that it's a possibility that Mariota drops because he is not "pro ready." Now, I respect Dilfer's opinion on quarterbacks as much as the next guy. But it should be noted that Dilfer has not studied all of Mariota's tape, so his opinion could change. 

But let's assume for a moment that Dilfer is right and Mariota drops. I hate to be a Debbie downer, but I still do not think it is either realistic or smart given the associated cost.

For context, below is the NFL Trade Value Chart. It was popularized by Jimmy Johnson back in the 1990s, and has been used as a blueprint for most NFL teams for making draft day trades.

 

Round 1

Round 2

Round 3

Round 4

Round 5

Round 6

Round 7

1

3,000

33

580

65

265

97

112

129

43

161

27

193

14.2

2

2,600

34

560

66

260

98

108

130

42

162

26.6

194

13.8

3

2,200

35

550

67

255

99

104

131

41

163

26.2

195

13.4

4

1,800

36

540

68

250

100

100

132

40

164

25.8

196

13

5

1,700

37

530

69

245

101

96

133

39.5

165

25.4

197

12.6

6

1,600

38

520

70

240

102

92

134

39

166

25

198

12.2

7

1,500

39

510

71

235

103

88

135

38.5

167

24.6

199

11.8

8

1,400

40

500

72

230

104

86

136

38

168

24.2

200

11.4

9

1,350

41

490

73

225

105

84

137

37.5

169

23.8

201

11

10

1,300

42

480

74

220

106

82

138

37

170

23.4

202

10.6

11

1,250

43

470

75

215

107

80

139

36.5

171

23

203

10.2

12

1,200

44

460

76

210

108

78

140

36

172

22.6

204

9.8

13

1,150

45

450

77

205

109

76

141

35.5

173

22.2

205

9.4

14

1,100

46

440

78

200

110

74

142

35

174

21.8

206

9

15

1,050

47

430

79

195

111

72

143

34.5

175

21.4

207

8.6

16

1,000

48

420

80

190

112

70

144

34

176

21

208

8.2

17

950

49

410

81

185

113

68

145

33.5

177

20.6

209

7.8

18

900

50

400

82

180

114

66

146

33

178

20.2

210

7.4

19

875

51

390

83

175

115

64

147

32.6

179

19.8

211

7

20

850

52

380

84

170

116

62

148

32.2

180

19.4

212

6.6

21

800

53

370

85

165

117

60

149

31.8

181

19

213

6.2

22

780

54

360

86

160

118

58

150

31.4

182

18.6

214

5.8

23

760

55

350

87

155

119

56

151

31

183

18.2

215

5.4

24

740

56

340

88

150

120

54

152

30.6

184

17.8

216

5

25

720

57

330

89

145

121

52

153

30.2

185

17.4

217

4.6

26

700

58

320

90

140

122

50

154

29.8

186

17

218

4.2

27

680

59

310

91

136

123

49

155

29.4

187

16.6

219

3.8

28

660

60

300

92

132

124

48

156

29

188

16.2

220

3.4

29

640

61

292

93

128

125

47

157

28.6

189

15.8

221

3

30

620

62

284

94

124

126

46

158

28.2

190

15.4

222

2.6

31

600

63

276

95

120

127

45

159

27.8

191

15

223

2.3

32

590

64

270

96

116

128

44

160

27.4

192

14.6

224

2

For those unfamiliar with the chart, it is really quite simple. It assigns values to every pick in every round of the draft so that teams can properly gauge how much each pick is worth when discussing trades. So if you want to make a trade to either move up or down the draft, this chart provides you an approximation of the type of value you should seek in return.

The Eagles are picking 20th this year and have 8 picks in the upcoming draft:  a draft pick in each round, plus the Buffalo Bills 4th round pick as a result of the Bryce Brown trade

If the Eagles traded their entire draft board, all 8 picks, they could move up from 20th to………. the 7th overall pick held by the Chicago Bears. (The 8 picks amount to 1,584.2 points, while the 7th pick overall is worth 1,500). So even if Mariota drops, we would have to pull off a Ricky Williams or Herschel Walker type trade just to be in the conversation, and that is not even considering how bad those trades turned out for the Vikings and Saints, respectively.

Which leaves us one other option: mortgaging the future by replicating the ill-fated Washington Redskins/St. Louis Rams trade for RGIII. If you recall, Washington gave up 3 first round picks and a 2nd rounder to move up just four spots, from 6th overall to 2nd. If it cost that much just to move up four spots, how much do you think the Eagles will have to give to move up 15 spots or so?

In other words, while you are going to hear a lot about whether the Eagles will trade for Mariota, I do not see how this is a realistic option.

But let’s assume for a moment that a trade is somehow possible. Does it even make sense given where the Eagles are situated? The Eagles have come off consecutive 10-6 seasons. They have a roster filled with a good combination of veterans and young emerging talent. But they have a couple of holes that simply must be addressed if they are going to advance to the next level. We have one competent player in the secondary in Malcom Jenkins. The offensive line has three players (Jason Peters, Evan Mathis and Todd Herramens) that are 32 or older. Do we really want to mortgage the future by trading multiple first round draft picks for the off chance that Mariota pans out? I don't. And I think Mariota is a great prospect. It is just too much of a risk for a team that is only a few pieces away from being among the NFL’s elite.